Satya, Inc., Gopal P. Bathija, Ameen M. Ali, and Satya Group II, Ltd. v. Vikram Mehta

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 3, 2013·No. 14-12-00965-CV·Published

Opinion

Order filed January 3, 2013

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-12-00965-CV ____________

SATYA, INC., GOPAL P. BATHIJA, AMEEN M. ALI AND SATYA GROUP II, LTD, Appellants

V.

VIKRAM MEHTA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012-27585

ORDER

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter for the 133rd District Court informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On December 4, 2012, the clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Satya, Inc., Gopal P. Bathija, Ameen M. Ali, and Satya Group II, Ltd. v. Vikram Mehta, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Satya, Inc., Gopal P. Bathija, Ameen M. Ali, and Satya Group II, Ltd. v. Vikram Mehta (Satya, Inc., Gopal P. Bathija, Ameen M. Ali, and Satya Group II, Ltd. v. Vikram Mehta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.