Saturno v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

205 N.E.2d 220, 348 Mass. 794
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 2, 1965·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff when she fell on an allegedly unnatural accumulation of ice on the public sidewalk in front of the building controlled by the defendant. A jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The ease is here upon the plaintiff’s exception to the allowance of the defendant’s motion for entry of a verdict for the defendant under leave reserved. There was no error. On the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff no inference is warranted that the patch of ice on which she fell resulted from water gathered in an awning attached to the defendant’s store and discharged therefrom upon the sidewalk. The plaintiff’s exception has its basis in conjecture and therefore cannot be sustained. Lewis v. Steinberg, 347 Mass. 312. Jefferson v. L’Heureux, 293 Mass. 490.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saturno v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 205 N.E.2d 220, 348 Mass. 794 (Mass. 1965).

205 N.E.2d 220 (Saturno v. F. W. Woolworth Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malley v. Albert Steiger, Inc.
281 N.E.2d 235 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1972)
Dinardo v. Bergin, Platner & Co.
43 Mass. App. Dec. 14 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1968)