Saturnino Doroteo, Jr. v. Walmart Inc.

Opinion

3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SATURNINO DOROTEO, JR CASE NO: 10 2:24−cv−09478−FMO−MAA Plaintiff(s), 11 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 12 WALMART INC. , et al. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 17 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, 18 IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs 19 and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45, to re-open the 20 action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction 21 over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure 22 to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline 23 set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the 24 action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 25 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 26 27 Dated The 24th of June 2025 /s/