Satur v. Satur

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Satur v. Satur

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 350

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedJuly 1, 1729

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 350 (Satur v. Satur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Satur v. Satur, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 350 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1729).

Pincite

Opinion

This Cause comeing this day to be heard before this Court in the Presence of Council learned on Both sides, Mr. Hume (of Council for the Complainant) Moved that the Complainants Bill be now read And the same being Read accordingly, The Substance thereof appeared to be That Thomas Satur (the Defendants Father deceased) being greatly indebted to the Defendant, Had in his Lifetime Mortgaged several Lands in Dorchester in the said Bill particularly Set forth, and the said Mortgage being but a very Scanty Security and far from satisfying the Complainants said Debt It was Prayed That the Defendant, (being Heire at Law to the same Thomas Satur) might be foreclosed of and from all Equity of Redemption in and to the said Mortgaged premisses; Whereupon Mr. Lewis ³⁵ Of Council for the Defendant Susanna (who was an Infant of about the Age of [blank] Yeares) Moved That Tweedie Somerville Esq. May be admitted her Guardian, And the said Defendant Susanna being in Court and desireing the same, and Mr. Somerville Consenting thereto It is by this Court Ordered accordingly, And the said Defendant (now by her said Guardian) Putting in her Answer Mr. Lewis Moved That the same may be Read And the same being Read accordingly, and the several Facts in the Bill being admitted and noe Objection being made to the Prayer of the Complainants Bill It is Ordered and Decreed That the Defendant Susanna Satur be Barred and Foreclosed from all Right and Equity of Redemption in and to the said Mortgaged Premisses Set forth and Described in the Complainants said Bill of Complaint, and that the Complainant Doe hold and enjoy the same to him and his Heires for ever Freed Cleared and Discharged of and from All manner of Right and Equity of Redemption whatsoever of the said Defendant or any claymeing under her And that the Complainant Doe pay the Costs of this Suite.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This Cause comeing this day to be heard before this Court in the Presence of Council learned on Both sides, Mr. Hume (of Council for the Complainant) Moved that the Complainants Bill be now read And the same being Read accordingly, The Substance thereof appeared to be That Thomas Satur (the Defendants Father deceased) being greatly indebted to the Defendant, Had in his Lifetime Mortgaged several Lands in Dorchester in the said Bill particularly Set forth, and the said Mortgage being but a very Scanty Security and far from satisfying the Complainants said Debt It was Prayed That the Defendant, (being Heire at Law to the same Thomas Satur) might be foreclosed of and from all Equity of Redemption in and to the said Mortgaged premisses; Whereupon Mr. Lewis ³⁵ Of Council for the Defendant Susanna (who was an Infant of about the Age of [blank] Yeares) Moved That Tweedie Somerville Esq. May be admitted her Guardian, And the said Defendant Susanna being in Court and desireing the same, and Mr. Somerville Consenting thereto It is by this Court Ordered accordingly, And the said Defendant (now by her said Guardian) Putting in her Answer Mr. Lewis Moved That the same may be Read And the same being Read accordingly, and the several Facts in the Bill being admitted and noe Objection being made to the Prayer of the Complainants Bill It is Ordered and Decreed That the Defendant Susanna Satur be Barred and Foreclosed from all Right and Equity of Redemption in and to the said Mortgaged Premisses Set forth and Described in the Complainants said Bill of Complaint, and that the Complainant Doe hold and enjoy the same to him and his Heires for ever Freed Cleared and Discharged of and from All manner of Right and Equity of Redemption whatsoever of the said Defendant or any claymeing under her And that the Complainant Doe pay the Costs of this Suite.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/satur-v-satur-ctchansc-1729.