Satti v. Bank of America, N.A.

324 F. App'x 251
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 29, 2009·No. No. 08-2271·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zeenia Satti appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Satti v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 1:08-cv-01008-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Satti v. Bank of America, N.A., 324 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2009).

324 F. App'x 251 (Satti v. Bank of America, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.