Satterwhite v. State

634 So. 2d 1158, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4096, 1994 WL 148152
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 1994·No. No. 92-3892·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting that no good faith argument can be made that reversible error occurred below. Based on our examination of the record, we agree no reversible error occurred; however, we note that the Judgment, Sentence and Order Placing Defendant on Probation During Portion of Sentence incorrectly indicates appellant pled nolo contendere, when, in fact, he had a jury trial. We hereby amend that order to correct the clerical error and reflect that appellant was found guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon following a jury trial. The judgment and sentence is affirmed in all other respects.

ERVIN, JOANOS and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Satterwhite v. State, 634 So. 2d 1158, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4096, 1994 WL 148152 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

634 So. 2d 1158 (Satterwhite v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thurman v. State
682 So. 2d 227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)