Satterlee v. True
This text of 3 Edw. Ch. 423 (Satterlee v. True) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
that where a judgment has been recovered since the first day of June, one thousand eight hundred and forty, when the new law took effect, in an action commenced before, it should appear affirmatively in the bill that the suitwas commenced before the first of June, in order to make the issuing and return of th e, fi.fa. regular, when the same has been issued before the expiration of thirty days and is returnable in less than sixty days.
The demurrer was allowed, with costs—giving liberty to amend.
His honor also gave it as his opinion that, on a judgment in the superior court, there was no necessity to docket it or issue execution in any other county than the city and county of New York.
Mr. Allen, for the defendants.
Mr. Howe, for the complainants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Edw. Ch. 423, 1840 N.Y. LEXIS 323, 1840 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/satterlee-v-true-nychanct-1840.