Satterlee v. Satterlee

New York Supreme Court

Satterlee v. Satterlee

8 Johns. 327

DecidedAugust 15, 1811

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Johns. 327 (Satterlee v. Satterlee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Satterlee v. Satterlee, 8 Johns. 327 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case comes within that of Dubois v. Philips, (5 Johns. Rep. 233.) and the double plea of non assumpsit and plene administrav.it, was not good, without the signature of counsel. Had the last plea been singly pleaded, it need not have been signed by counsel; but double pleas must be sq signed, according to the practice of the court of K. B., which is the practice of this court in those cases in which a different practice has not been established, (1 Tidd, 621, 622. 2 Bast, 225.) We grant the motion to set aside the default, and to let the defendants in to plead, upon payment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case comes within that of Dubois v. Philips, (5 Johns. Rep. 233.) and the double plea of non assumpsit and plene administrav.it, was not good, without the signature of counsel. Had the last plea been singly pleaded, it need not have been signed by counsel; but double pleas must be sq signed, according to the practice of the court of K. B., which is the practice of this court in those cases in which a different practice has not been established, (1 Tidd, 621, 622. 2 Bast, 225.) We grant the motion to set aside the default, and to let the defendants in to plead, upon payment of costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Johns. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/satterlee-v-satterlee-nysupct-1811.