Satterlee v. Internal Revenue Service

Eighth Circuit

Satterlee v. Internal Revenue Service

252 F. App'x 117

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 25, 2007

Docket06-3776

StatusUnpublished

This text of 252 F. App'x 117 (Satterlee v. Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Satterlee v. Internal Revenue Service, 252 F. App'x 117 (8th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald L. Satterlee appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his action challenging the result of a collection due process hearing relating to tax deficiencies and a civil penalty assessed against him. Upon this court’s de novo review, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons given by the district court. See Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P., 395 F.3d 851, 853 (8th Cir.2005) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal standard of review). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Satterlee’s motion to reconsider. See MIF Realty, L.P. v. Rochester Associates, 92 F.3d 752, 755 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ronald L. Satterlee appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his action challenging the result of a collection due process hearing relating to tax deficiencies and a civil penalty assessed against him. Upon this court’s de novo review, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons given by the district court. See Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P., 395 F.3d 851, 853 (8th Cir.2005) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal standard of review). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Satterlee’s motion to reconsider. See MIF Realty, L.P. v. Rochester Associates, 92 F.3d 752, 755 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 F. App'x 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/satterlee-v-internal-revenue-service-ca8-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack