Satterlee v. Internal Revenue Service

252 F. App'x 117
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2007·No. 06-3776·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald L. Satterlee appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his action challenging the result of a collection due process hearing relating to tax deficiencies and a civil penalty assessed against him. Upon this court’s de novo review, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons given by the district court. See Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P., 395 F.3d 851, 853 (8th Cir.2005) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal standard of review). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Satterlee’s motion to reconsider. See MIF Realty, L.P. v. Rochester Associates, 92 F.3d 752, 755 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Satterlee v. Internal Revenue Service, 252 F. App'x 117 (8th Cir. 2007).

252 F. App'x 117 (Satterlee v. Internal Revenue Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mif Realty L. P. v. Rochester Associates
92 F.3d 752 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, LLP
395 F.3d 851 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)