Satterlee v. City of Aurora

Supreme Court of Colorado

Satterlee v. City of Aurora

359 P.2d 8, 145 Colo. 357, 1961 Colo. LEXIS 670

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedJanuary 30, 1961

DocketNo. 19,228

StatusPublished

This text of 359 P.2d 8 (Satterlee v. City of Aurora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Satterlee v. City of Aurora, 359 P.2d 8, 145 Colo. 357, 1961 Colo. LEXIS 670 (Colo. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sutton.

Satterlee and other parties, plaintiffs in error in this court, by way of writ of error, seek to have reviewed the action of the district court in affirming City Council of Aurora whereby a package store liquor license was issued to one Vernon L. Nichols.

They urge numerous grounds of error which can be summarized as: (1) alleged errors in procedural handling of the matter, (2) an abuse of discretion in issu[358]*358ing the license, and (3) that certain newly-discovered evidence should now be presented to this court.

We have reviewed the record and briefs of the parties and find no merit to the contentions of the plaintiffs in error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Frantz and Mr. Justice Doyle concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI