Satterfield v. Satterfield

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Satterfield v. Satterfield

444 So. 2d 1122, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11729

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1984·No. Nos. 83-1138, 83-2487·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court and, therefore, affirm. See Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983). The appeal in case number 83-2487 is from a temporary post-dissolution modification entered during the pendency of the plenary appeal in case number 83-1138, as authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(c), see Campbell v. Campbell, 436 So.2d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court and, therefore, affirm. See Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983). The appeal in case number 83-2487 is from a temporary post-dissolution modification entered during the pendency of the plenary appeal in case number 83-1138, as authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(c), see Campbell v. Campbell, 436 So.2d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

Affirmed.

Satterfield v. Satterfield, 444 So. 2d 1122, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11729 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

444 So. 2d 1122 (Satterfield v. Satterfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related