Satterfield v. . Manning

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Satterfield v. . Manning

46 S.E.2d 104, 228 N.C. 471, 1948 N.C. LEXIS 253

DecidedJanuary 30, 1948

StatusPublished

This text of 46 S.E.2d 104 (Satterfield v. . Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Satterfield v. . Manning, 46 S.E.2d 104, 228 N.C. 471, 1948 N.C. LEXIS 253 (N.C. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

DeviN, J.

In view of the opinion in Satterfield v. Manning, ante, 467, holding that the demurrer to the complaint in that action should have been sustained, and that thus the alleged rights of the plaintiffs as creditors of the estate of Sallie A. Rigsbee were not upheld, it follows *472 that plaintiffs’ proceeding as creditors against certain real estate of the decedent must fail.

For this reason, the judgment below must be

Reversed.

Sohenok, Jv took no pai’t in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeviN, J.

In view of the opinion in Satterfield v. Manning, ante, 467, holding that the demurrer to the complaint in that action should have been sustained, and that thus the alleged rights of the plaintiffs as creditors of the estate of Sallie A. Rigsbee were not upheld, it follows *472 that plaintiffs’ proceeding as creditors against certain real estate of the decedent must fail.

For this reason, the judgment below must be

Reversed.

Sohenok, Jv took no pai’t in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 S.E.2d 104, 228 N.C. 471, 1948 N.C. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/satterfield-v-manning-nc-1948.