Satterfield v. Eckerd's of Raleigh, N. C., Inc.

201 N.C. 599
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 4, 1931·Published

Opinion

Pee CukiaM.

The assignment of error chiefly relied on by defendants on their appeal to this Court is based on their exception to the refusal of the trial court to allow their motion for judgment as of nonsuit. C. S., 567. This assignment of error cannot be sustained.

[601]*601'Whether the words which the evidence shows were spoken of and concerning the plaintiff by the defendant, H. C. Maeyer, are actionable as slanderous, was properly submitted to the jury. Castelloe v. Phelps, 198 N. C., 454, 152 S. E., 163.

The principle on which the defendant Eckerd’s of Raleigh, N. C., Incorporated, is liable for the damages sustained by plaintiff, resulting from slanderous words spoken of and concerning him by its manager, the defendant, H. C. Maeyer, is discussed and applied in Cotton v. Fisheries Products Co., 177 N. C., 56, 97 S. E., 712. We find no error. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Satterfield v. Eckerd's of Raleigh, N. C., Inc., 201 N.C. 599 (N.C. 1931).

201 N.C. 599 (Satterfield v. Eckerd's of Raleigh, N. C., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castelloe v. . Phelps
152 S.E. 163 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Cotton v. Fisheries Products Co.
97 S.E. 712 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)