Satra Corp. v. Pullman Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Satra Corp. v. Pullman Inc.

102 A.D.2d 731, 476 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.2d 731 (Satra Corp. v. Pullman Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Satra Corp. v. Pullman Inc., 102 A.D.2d 731, 476 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (H. Cahn, J.), entered March 26, 1983, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on its first cause of action for an accounting, referring the accounting to a referee, and denying defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, is unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing so much of the order as grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for an accounting and directs a reference of accounting, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs, f It cannot be said as a matter of law that plaintiff has shown such a fiduciary or trust relationship to the subject matter of the controversy as to form a basis for the equitable remedy of accounting. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Silverman and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (H. Cahn, J.), entered March 26, 1983, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on its first cause of action for an accounting, referring the accounting to a referee, and denying defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, is unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing so much of the order as grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for an accounting and directs a reference of accounting, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs, f It cannot be said as a matter of law that plaintiff has shown such a fiduciary or trust relationship to the subject matter of the controversy as to form a basis for the equitable remedy of accounting. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Silverman and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 731, 476 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/satra-corp-v-pullman-inc-nyappdiv-1984.