Satonstall v. Canal Commissioners
13 Ill. 705
Opinion
The motion must prevail. The order must be understood to mean the vacation immediately succeeding the term at which the judgment was rendered. The order did not extend to any other vacation.
By any other construction, there might not be any limitation fixing the time for filing the exceptions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Satonstall v. Canal Commissioners, 13 Ill. 705 (Ill. 1852).
13 Ill. 705 (Satonstall v. Canal Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Warner v. Kelley
5 Ill. App. 559 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1880)
Hall v. Mills
5 Ill. App. 495 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1879)