Satonstall v. Canal Commissioners
13 Ill. 705
This text of 13 Ill. 705 (Satonstall v. Canal Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Satonstall v. Canal Commissioners, 13 Ill. 705 (Ill. 1852).
Opinion
The motion must prevail. The order must be understood to mean the vacation immediately succeeding the term at which the judgment was rendered. The order did not extend to any other vacation.
By any other construction, there might not be any limitation fixing the time for filing the exceptions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Warner v. Kelley
5 Ill. App. 559 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1880)
Hall v. Mills
5 Ill. App. 495 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1879)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 Ill. 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/satonstall-v-canal-commissioners-ill-1852.