Satiro v. City of New Rochelle
474 N.E.2d 255, 64 N.Y.2d 614, 485 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4952
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (102 AD2d 821).
*616 Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Satiro v. City of New Rochelle, 474 N.E.2d 255, 64 N.Y.2d 614, 485 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4952 (N.Y. 1984).
474 N.E.2d 255 (Satiro v. City of New Rochelle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sostre v. City of New York Housing Authority
150 A.D.2d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Pascarella v. City of New York
146 A.D.2d 61 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Goldberg v. State
122 A.D.2d 248 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Crosland v. New York City Transit Authority
110 A.D.2d 148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)