Satfraz Taj and Zubeda Taj v. Highlander Community Services and Investment, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 27, 2019·No. 05-19-00369-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISSED; Opinion Filed August 27, 2019.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00369-CV

SATFRAZ TAJ AND ZUBEDA TAJ, Appellants V. HIGHLANDER COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INVESTMENT, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-02669-2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Nowell Opinion by Justice Nowell This is an appeal from the trial court’s March 21, 2019 order denying appellant’s request

for a temporary injunction. By notice filed August 15, 2019, appellee has informed the Court that

a final judgment has been signed and prays the case be dismissed. Attached to the notice is the

judgment, which has also been included in a supplemental clerk’s record. We construe the notice

as a motion to dismiss and grant the motion.

The signing of a final judgment while an appeal of an order granting or denying a temporary

injunction is pending moots the appeal. See Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Grp., P.A., 802

S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex. 1991) (per curiam). When an appeal from the denial of a temporary

injunction becomes moot because a final judgment has been signed, we must set aside all previous

trial court orders concerning the requested temporary injunction and dismiss the case. See id. (citing Tex. Foundries, Inc. v. Int’l Moulders & Foundry Workers’ Union, 248 S.W.2d 460, 461

(Tex. 1952).

More than ten days have passed since appellee’s motion was filed, and appellants have not

responded to the motion. Because the trial court has signed a final judgment and nothing before

us reflects the appeal is not moot, we grant the motion, set aside the trial court’s order denying the

request for a temporary injunction, and dismiss the case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Isuani, 802

S.W.2d at 236.

/Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

190369F.P05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

SATFRAZ TAJ AND ZUBEDA TAJ, On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Appellants Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-02669-2018. No. 05-19-00369-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell, Chief Justice Burns and Justice Molberg HIGHLANDER COMMUNITY participating. SERVICES AND INVESTMENT, LLC, Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we SET ASIDE the trial court’s order denying the request for temporary injunction and DISMISS the case.

We ORDER that appellee Highlander Community Services and Investment, LLC recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Satfraz Taj and Zubeda Taj.

Judgment entered this 27th day of August, 2019.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Satfraz Taj and Zubeda Taj v. Highlander Community Services and Investment, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Satfraz Taj and Zubeda Taj v. Highlander Community Services and Investment, LLC (Satfraz Taj and Zubeda Taj v. Highlander Community Services and Investment, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Group, P.A.
802 S.W.2d 235 (Texas Supreme Court, 1991)