Satchwell v. Warner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Satchwell v. Warner

19 A.2d 830, 129 N.J. Eq. 384, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 652

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 25, 1941·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported at 127 N. J. Eq. 544.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported at 127 N. J. Eq. 544.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Satchwell v. Warner, 19 A.2d 830, 129 N.J. Eq. 384, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 652 (N.J. 1941).

Pincite

19 A.2d 830 (Satchwell v. Warner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.