Satcher v. Oddo

Fourth Circuit

Satcher v. Oddo

673 F. App'x 361

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2017·No. No. 16-7037·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen D. Satcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Satcher v. Oddo, No. 2:14-cv-00092-JPB-RWT, 2016 WL 3637081 (N.D. W. Va. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen D. Satcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Satcher v. Oddo, No. 2:14-cv-00092-JPB-RWT, 2016 WL 3637081 (N.D. W. Va. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Satcher v. Oddo, 673 F. App'x 361 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

673 F. App'x 361 (Satcher v. Oddo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related