Satcher v. Hogsten

576 F. App'x 221
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2014·No. No. 13-7789·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen D. Satcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Satcher’s claim is without merit. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Satcher v. Hogsten, 576 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2014).

576 F. App'x 221 (Satcher v. Hogsten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bullock v. Bolster
E.D. Virginia, 2020
Lee v. United States
N.D. Alabama, 2020