Sassower v. Commission on Judicial Conduct

778 N.E.2d 550, 98 N.Y.2d 719, 748 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 2322
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 12, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 778 N.E.2d 550 (Sassower v. Commission on Judicial Conduct) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sassower v. Commission on Judicial Conduct, 778 N.E.2d 550, 98 N.Y.2d 719, 748 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 2322 (N.Y. 2002).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Judge Rosenblatt, dismissed as academic; motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Graffeo dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no authority to entertain the motion made on nonstatutory grounds. The application seeking recusal is referred to the Judges for individual consideration and determination by each Judge.

[720]*720Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Graffeo. Taking no part: Judge Rosenblatt.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Graffeo each respectively denies the referred motion for recusal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
778 N.E.2d 550, 98 N.Y.2d 719, 748 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 2322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sassower-v-commission-on-judicial-conduct-ny-2002.