Sasser v. . Harris

100 S.E. 338, 178 N.C. 322, 1919 N.C. LEXIS 447
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 15, 1919·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BeowN, J.

This as an action by the plaintiffs against the defendants, constituting the members of the city board of elections of the city of Wilmington, for the purpose of having declared void the call made by the board for the primary election under the act of the General Assembly of 1919, authorizing the board of elections to call the primary and fix the date for the holding thereof, which act is recited in the record.

The cause was heard before his Honor, Thomas II. Calvert, judge, at the March Term, 1919, of the Superior Court of New Hanover County, and upon said hearing his Honor restrained the holding of the said primary election on the date fixed by the board, and ordered the election tO| be held on the date as provided by the law in force relative thereto, prior to the passage of the act of 1919, and from the judgment of the court defendants appealed.

It appears that the primary election has long since been held and doubtless the candidates now have been duly elected. Nothing can now *323 be accomplished by setting aside the order of Judge Calvert. If his judgment was reversed this Court could, not now order another primary. The question has thus become merely a moot question and there is nothing for the judgment of the Court to operate upon.

The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sasser v. . Harris, 100 S.E. 338, 178 N.C. 322, 1919 N.C. LEXIS 447 (N.C. 1919).

100 S.E. 338 (Sasser v. . Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Galloway v. Board of Education of Brunswick County
114 S.E. 165 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)