Sassene v. City of Atlanta

136 S.E. 109, 36 Ga. App. 208, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 871
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 14, 1926·No. 17679·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

Cora Sassene, having been convicted in the recorder’s court of the City of Atlanta for a violation of a city ordinance, presented to the judge of the superior court a petition for writ of certiorari. The judge properly refused to sanction the writ, for the reason that the petition did not comply with the statutory requirements of law in the matter of verification and giving bond or filing a pauper’s affidavit. We say that, in addition to the reasons given by the judge for not sanctioning the petition for certiorari, the petition did not set out a single meritorious reason why the conviction of petitioner in the recorder’s court should be set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sassene v. City of Atlanta, 136 S.E. 109, 36 Ga. App. 208, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 871 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

136 S.E. 109 (Sassene v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Felton
80 S.E.2d 625 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
O'Neal v. City of Atlanta
140 S.E. 797 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)