Sassenburgh v. Shaver

7 N.J.L. 170
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 15, 1824
StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.J.L. 170 (Sassenburgh v. Shaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sassenburgh v. Shaver, 7 N.J.L. 170 (N.J. 1824).

Opinion

*Kirkpatrick, O. J.

The service of an expired rule is a nugatory thing. The correct mode of practice is to renew the rule from term to term until it is served.

Bossell, J. concurred with the Chief Justice.

Ford, J." doubted.

Motion for judgment refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 N.J.L. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sassenburgh-v-shaver-nj-1824.