Sass v. Cohen

440 P.3d 1111, 247 Cal. Rptr. 3d 85
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sass v. Cohen. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Cal. 5th 861
California Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 2019·No. S255262·Published

Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: (1) In a complaint that seeks an accounting of specified assets, is the plaintiff required to plead a specific amount of damages to support a default judgment, or is it sufficient for purposes of Code of Civil Procedure section 580 to identify the assets that are in defendant's possession and request half of their value? (2) Should the comparison of whether a default judgment exceeds the amount of compensatory damages demanded in the operative pleadings examine the aggregate amount of non-duplicative damages or instead proceed on a claim-by-claim or item-by-item basis?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sass v. Cohen, 440 P.3d 1111, 247 Cal. Rptr. 3d 85 (Cal. 2019).

440 P.3d 1111 (Sass v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.