Sass & Crawford, in Error v. Minnie Thomas and Charley Thomas

214 U.S. 489, 29 S. Ct. 695
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 22, 1909
Docket112
StatusPublished

This text of 214 U.S. 489 (Sass & Crawford, in Error v. Minnie Thomas and Charley Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sass & Crawford, in Error v. Minnie Thomas and Charley Thomas, 214 U.S. 489, 29 S. Ct. 695 (1909).

Opinion

214 U.S. 489

29 S.Ct. 695

53 L.Ed. 1057

SASS & CRAWFORD, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MINNIE THOMAS and Charley Thomas.

No. 112.

March 22, 1909.

Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter and S. T. Bledsoe for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. A. C. Cruce and W. I. Cruce for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: The Writ of Error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, on authority of Laurel Oil & Gas Co. v. Morrison, 212 U. S. 291, 53 L. ed. ——, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 394, decided on February 23, last.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laurel Oil & Gas Co. v. Morrison
212 U.S. 291 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Sass & Crawford v. Thomas
214 U.S. 489 (Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 U.S. 489, 29 S. Ct. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sass-crawford-in-error-v-minnie-thomas-and-charley-thomas-scotus-1909.