Sasek v. Triska

Appellate Court of Illinois

Sasek v. Triska

205 Ill. App. 414, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 1169

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 30, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,884

StatusPublished

This text of 205 Ill. App. 414 (Sasek v. Triska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sasek v. Triska, 205 Ill. App. 414, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 1169 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Malicious prosecution, § 74*—what must he proved in action for. In an action for malicious prosecution, it is essential that malice be shown on the part of the defendant who started the prosecution, and a want of probable cause for believing that the plaintiff was guilty of the offense charged, and want of such probable cause is not shown by the acquittal of the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Malicious prosecution, § 74*—what must he proved in action for. In an action for malicious prosecution, it is essential that malice be shown on the part of the defendant who started the prosecution, and a want of probable cause for believing that the plaintiff was guilty of the offense charged, and want of such probable cause is not shown by the acquittal of the plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 Ill. App. 414, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 1169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sasek-v-triska-illappct-1917.