Sasek v. Craig

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sasek v. Craig

777 So. 2d 1005, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16345, 2000 WL 1836754

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 15, 2000

DocketNo. 5D00-419

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 777 So. 2d 1005 (Sasek v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sasek v. Craig, 777 So. 2d 1005, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16345, 2000 WL 1836754 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the pleadings and the text of the order appealed, we conclude that the lower court did not commit reversible error in its declaration concerning the structure proposed to be built on appellant’s lot in Glenwood Hammock. We conclude, however, on the cross-appeal, that appellees were the prevailing parties below and that the trial court erred in failing to award attorneys’ fees and costs to appellees. Accordingly, we reverse the portion of the appealed judgment denying fees and remand for the lower court to determine a reasonable fee and costs.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

HARRIS, J., and JOHNSON, C.T., Associate Judge, concur. GRIFFIN, J., concurring in part; dissenting in part, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the pleadings and the text of the order appealed, we conclude that the lower court did not commit reversible error in its declaration concerning the structure proposed to be built on appellant’s lot in Glenwood Hammock. We conclude, however, on the cross-appeal, that appellees were the prevailing parties below and that the trial court erred in failing to award attorneys’ fees and costs to appellees. Accordingly, we reverse the portion of the appealed judgment denying fees and remand for the lower court to determine a reasonable fee and costs.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

HARRIS, J., and JOHNSON, C.T., Associate Judge, concur. GRIFFIN, J., concurring in part; dissenting in part, with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

777 So. 2d 1005, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16345, 2000 WL 1836754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sasek-v-craig-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack