Sasek v. Craig

777 So. 2d 1005, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16345, 2000 WL 1836754
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 2000·No. No. 5D00-419·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the pleadings and the text of the order appealed, we conclude that the lower court did not commit reversible error in its declaration concerning the structure proposed to be built on appellant’s lot in Glenwood Hammock. We conclude, however, on the cross-appeal, that appellees were the prevailing parties below and that the trial court erred in failing to award attorneys’ fees and costs to appellees. Accordingly, we reverse the portion of the appealed judgment denying fees and remand for the lower court to determine a reasonable fee and costs.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

HARRIS, J., and JOHNSON, C.T., Associate Judge, concur. GRIFFIN, J., concurring in part; dissenting in part, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sasek v. Craig, 777 So. 2d 1005, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16345, 2000 WL 1836754 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

777 So. 2d 1005 (Sasek v. Craig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vick v. Bailey
777 So. 2d 1005 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)