Sasaki v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Sasaki v. Commonwealth

497 S.W.2d 713, 1973 Ky. LEXIS 363

DecidedMay 4, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 497 S.W.2d 713 (Sasaki v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sasaki v. Commonwealth, 497 S.W.2d 713, 1973 Ky. LEXIS 363 (Ky. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinions

CULLEN, Commissioner.

In the decision of this court in this case reported in 485 S.W.2d 897, the Kentucky [714]*714abortion statute, KRS 436.020, ■ was held constitutional and the conviction of Dr. Yasuo Sasaki for violating that statute was affirmed. Dr. Sasaki appealed that decision to the United States Supreme Court. Pending that appeal, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147. Thereupon, the Supreme Court, 410 U.S. 951, 93 S.Ct. 1422, 35 L.Ed.2d 684, vacated our decision in the instant case and remanded the case to this court with directions for further consideration in light of Roe v. Wade.

This court has made the directed consideration and is compelled to hold that since the Kentucky abortion statute is basically indistinguishable from the Texas statute held unconstitutional in Roe v. Wade, our statute also is unconstitutional. We so hold, which means that the conviction of Dr. Saski cannot stand.

The judgment is reversed with directions to dismiss the indictment.

PALMORE, C. J., and MILLIKEN, OSBORNE, REED, STEINFELD and STEPHENSON, JJ., sitting.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CULLEN, Commissioner.

In the decision of this court in this case reported in 485 S.W.2d 897, the Kentucky [714]*714abortion statute, KRS 436.020, ■ was held constitutional and the conviction of Dr. Yasuo Sasaki for violating that statute was affirmed. Dr. Sasaki appealed that decision to the United States Supreme Court. Pending that appeal, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147. Thereupon, the Supreme Court, 410 U.S. 951, 93 S.Ct. 1422, 35 L.Ed.2d 684, vacated our decision in the instant case and remanded the case to this court with directions for further consideration in light of Roe v. Wade.

This court has made the directed consideration and is compelled to hold that since the Kentucky abortion statute is basically indistinguishable from the Texas statute held unconstitutional in Roe v. Wade, our statute also is unconstitutional. We so hold, which means that the conviction of Dr. Saski cannot stand.

The judgment is reversed with directions to dismiss the indictment.

PALMORE, C. J., and MILLIKEN, OSBORNE, REED, STEINFELD and STEPHENSON, JJ., sitting.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 S.W.2d 713, 1973 Ky. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sasaki-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1973.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack