S.A.S. v. State

820 So. 2d 449, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668, 2002 WL 1466296
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 2002·No. No. 2D01-2526·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, S.A.S. challenges only the provision imposing restitution which was contained within a disposition order entitled “Order Placing Child on Juvenile Probation.” That disposition order arose from an adjudicatory hearing to determine S.A.S.’s guilt for petit theft and her delinquency as a result of committing that offense. S.A.S. was the only witness at the adjudicatory hearing, and she testified concerning the offense itself. Absolutely no evidence in regard to restitution was presented. Because there was a complete lack of evidence concerning any aspect of restitution, we reverse the portion of the disposition order imposing restitution and remand this matter for an evidentiary hearing in order for the juvenile court to make the proper determinations in this regard.

BLUE, C.J., and SALCINES and DAVIS, JJ, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.A.S. v. State, 820 So. 2d 449, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668, 2002 WL 1466296 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

820 So. 2d 449 (S.A.S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Iaconetti v. State
869 So. 2d 695 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)