S.A.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

S.A.S. v. State

820 So. 2d 449, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668, 2002 WL 1466296

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 10, 2002

DocketNo. 2D01-2526

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 820 So. 2d 449 (S.A.S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.A.S. v. State, 820 So. 2d 449, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668, 2002 WL 1466296 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, S.A.S. challenges only the provision imposing restitution which was contained within a disposition order entitled “Order Placing Child on Juvenile Probation.” That disposition order arose from an adjudicatory hearing to determine S.A.S.’s guilt for petit theft and her delinquency as a result of committing that offense. S.A.S. was the only witness at the adjudicatory hearing, and she testified concerning the offense itself. Absolutely no evidence in regard to restitution was presented. Because there was a complete lack of evidence concerning any aspect of restitution, we reverse the portion of the disposition order imposing restitution and remand this matter for an evidentiary hearing in order for the juvenile court to make the proper determinations in this regard.

BLUE, C.J., and SALCINES and DAVIS, JJ, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, S.A.S. challenges only the provision imposing restitution which was contained within a disposition order entitled “Order Placing Child on Juvenile Probation.” That disposition order arose from an adjudicatory hearing to determine S.A.S.’s guilt for petit theft and her delinquency as a result of committing that offense. S.A.S. was the only witness at the adjudicatory hearing, and she testified concerning the offense itself. Absolutely no evidence in regard to restitution was presented. Because there was a complete lack of evidence concerning any aspect of restitution, we reverse the portion of the disposition order imposing restitution and remand this matter for an evidentiary hearing in order for the juvenile court to make the proper determinations in this regard.

BLUE, C.J., and SALCINES and DAVIS, JJ, Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

820 So. 2d 449, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668, 2002 WL 1466296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sas-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack