Sas-Jaworsky v. Commissioner

1965 T.C. Memo. 120, 24 T.C.M. 630, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 210
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMay 4, 1965
DocketDocket Nos. 95155 & 95156.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1965 T.C. Memo. 120 (Sas-Jaworsky v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sas-Jaworsky v. Commissioner, 1965 T.C. Memo. 120, 24 T.C.M. 630, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 210 (tax 1965).

Opinion

Natalie Sas-Jaworsky v. Commissioner. Alexander Sas-Jaworsky v. Commissioner.
Sas-Jaworsky v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 95155 & 95156.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1965-120; 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 210; 24 T.C.M. (CCH) 630; T.C.M. (RIA) 65120;
May 4, 1965

*210 Petitioner Alexander Sas-Jaworsky and others formed a corporation for the purpose of publishing and promoting a book. Held: Petitioners may not deduct a loss incurred with respect to the book.

Held further: Petitioners may not have a deduction for a casualty loss in connection with the destruction of some of the books by fire.

Held further: Petitioners are not entitled to a nonbusiness bad debt deduction for the payment of the debt of another.

Alexander Sas-Jaworsky, pro se, So. State St., Abbeville, Vermilion Parish, La. George T. Rita, for the respondent.

BRUCE

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

BRUCE, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency for the year 1959 in the income tax of petitioner Natalie Sas-Jaworsky in the amount of $1,931.81 and a deficiency for the year 1959 in the*211 income tax of petitioner Alexander Sas-Jaworsky in the amount of $2,075.81. The first two issues in these consolidated cases are (1) whether petitioners are entitled to a deduction for the loss on the promotion and publication of a certain book, and (2) whether petitioners are entitled to a casualty loss on the destruction of some of these books by fire. The resolution of these issues depends upon whether a corporation created for the purpose of promoting the book is to be treated as a separate taxable entity. The third issue is whether petitioners are entitled to a bad debt deduction for the payment of the debt of another.

Findings of Fact

Some of the facts have been stipulated and the stipulation of facts and exhibits attached thereto are incorporated herein by this reference.

Petitioners are husband and wife who reside in Abbeville, Louisiana. They filed separate income tax returns for the year 1959 with the district director of internal revenue at New Orleans on which they reported their respective shares of their community income under the laws of Louisiana.

On April 6, 1959, Dr. Alexander Sas-Jaworsky (hereinafter referred to as Alexander) entered into an agreement with*212 Joe Choate (hereinafter referred to as Choate) and Roy Theriot (hereinafter referred to as Theriot) with regard to a manuscript relating to the life of Alexander. The agreement provided as follows:

This agreement made and entered into, this 6th day of April, 1959, by and between the following parties:

1. DR. ALEXANDER SAS-JAWORSKY, married to and living with Natalia Sas-Jaworsky, a resident of Vermilion Parish, Louisiana;

2. JOE CHOATE, single and of lawful age of majority, a resident of Vermilion Parish, Louisiana;

3. ROY THERIOT, married to and living with Helen Roberts, a resident of Vermilion Parish, Louisiana.

WHEREAS, each of the above-mentioned parties has given of his time, talents, and efforts, and otherwise materially contributed in preparing and writing a manuscript relating to the life of Dr. Alexander Sas-Jaworsky, said manuscript being temporarily entitled These They Gifts, The Story of Alexander Sas-Jaworsky;

WHEREAS, it is the intention and desire of the above-mentioned parties to publish said manuscript and to secure a copyright thereof.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises above mentioned, it is hereby understood, covenanted, and agreed, *213 by and among the said parties to this agreement, that they are each vested as owners in the property rights of said manuscript, and each shall share in the following proportions:

Dr. Alexander Sas-Jaworsky50 per cent
Joe Choate40 per cent
Roy Theriot10 per cent
in any and all profits, after expenses, resulting from the copyrighting and publishing of same, as well as any other future profits that may be realized by the sale of or by the revenue arising from any other business transactions connected with or related to the above property rights, without exception or reservation.

This agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of each of the parties hereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties, to these presents, have hereunto, in triplicate original, set their hands, the day and date first above written.

WITNESSES:

/s/ Ambrose Broussard

/s/ Lois Hebert

/s/ Dr. A. Sas-Jaworsky / DR. ALEXANDER SAS-JAWORSKY

/s/ Joe Choate / JOE CHOATE

/s/ Roy Theriot / ROY THERIOT

/s/ Carrol L. Spell / NOTARY PUBLIC

* * *

At the same time and on the same date as this agreement, Alexander, Choate and Theriot*214 organized a corporation known as American Promotions, Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as American) under the laws of Louisiana. The Articles of Incorporation of American, which were filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Louisiana on April 8, 1959, provided that the corporation was organized:

To promote the sale of the biography of Dr. Alexander Sas-Jaworsky, or any other book or books which this corporation may undertake to promote, together with movie, television and radio rights incidental to the proper promotion of said book or books to be promoted by this corporation, and to do and perform all things necessary and proper to carry out the purposes and objects of this corporation.

Alexander, Choate, and Theriot signed the Articles of Incorporation as incorporators and were designated the corporation's directors. Alexander and Theriot were named its registered agents. The total number of authorized shares of stock of the corporation was 100 shares of a par value of $10 each. Alexander received 50 percent, Choate 40 percent, and Theriot 10 percent of the shares of stock issued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moline Properties, Inc. v. Commissioner
319 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Interstate Transit Lines v. Commissioner
319 U.S. 590 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Skarda v. Commissioner
27 T.C. 137 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)
Garden State Developers, Inc. v. Commissioner
30 T.C. 135 (U.S. Tax Court, 1958)
Wilson v. Commissioner
40 T.C. 543 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1965 T.C. Memo. 120, 24 T.C.M. 630, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sas-jaworsky-v-commissioner-tax-1965.