Sarver v. State
547 S.W.3d 607
Opinion
John Sarver appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of an evidentiary hearing on his post-conviction claims. We affirm.
*608An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sarver v. State, 547 S.W.3d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
547 S.W.3d 607 (Sarver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.