Sarver v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sarver v. State

547 S.W.3d 607

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 22, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105550

StatusPublished

This text of 547 S.W.3d 607 (Sarver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sarver v. State, 547 S.W.3d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Sarver appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of an evidentiary hearing on his post-conviction claims. We affirm.

*608An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Sarver appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of an evidentiary hearing on his post-conviction claims. We affirm.

*608An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 S.W.3d 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarver-v-state-moctapp-2018.