Sarver v. Garcia
This text of 49 Cal. 218 (Sarver v. Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The judgment was for plaintiff, and the Court below granted a new trial on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify the findings.
Appellant (plaintiff in the Court below), argues that the District Court erred for the reasons: First, that the bill of exceptions was not signed or certified by the referee or Judge; second, that the objections do not specify the particulars in which the evidence was insufficient.
1. The signature or certificate of the referee or Judge was waived by stipulation.
2. The exceptions do specify the particulars in which the evidence was claimed to be insufficient.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 Cal. 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarver-v-garcia-cal-1874.