Sartwell v. Mack

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Sartwell v. Mack

49 A. 571, 70 N.H. 636

DecidedDecember 5, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A. 571 (Sartwell v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sartwell v. Mack, 49 A. 571, 70 N.H. 636 (N.H. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Pike, J.

It does not appear that the plaintiffs objected at the time to the trial of the defendant’s cause, -arising out of the former sale. Nor is there any suggestion that the trial was not fair, or that the plaintiffs- have been prejudiced by the course pursued. It is now too late for the plaintiffs to object.

Exception overruled.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pike, J.

It does not appear that the plaintiffs objected at the time to the trial of the defendant’s cause, -arising out of the former sale. Nor is there any suggestion that the trial was not fair, or that the plaintiffs- have been prejudiced by the course pursued. It is now too late for the plaintiffs to object.

Exception overruled.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A. 571, 70 N.H. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sartwell-v-mack-nh-1900.