Sarro v. Sarro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sarro v. Sarro

238 A.D.2d 330, 656 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3409

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Marrero, J.), dated March 11, 1996, which granted the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend her complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well established that leave to amend pleadings shall be freely given unless the party opposing the motion can demon[331]*331strate prejudice or surprise from a delay (see, Corsale v Pantry Pride Supermarket, 197 AD2d 659; Evans v Kringstein, 193 AD2d 714). The defendant has failed to make the requisite showing in this case. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Marrero, J.), dated March 11, 1996, which granted the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend her complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well established that leave to amend pleadings shall be freely given unless the party opposing the motion can demon[331]*331strate prejudice or surprise from a delay (see, Corsale v Pantry Pride Supermarket, 197 AD2d 659; Evans v Kringstein, 193 AD2d 714). The defendant has failed to make the requisite showing in this case. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Sarro v. Sarro, 238 A.D.2d 330, 656 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

238 A.D.2d 330 (Sarro v. Sarro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related