Saro A. De Fiore v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Saro A. De Fiore v. United States

230 F.2d 955

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 6, 1955

Docket5085_1

StatusPublished

This text of 230 F.2d 955 (Saro A. De Fiore v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saro A. De Fiore v. United States, 230 F.2d 955 (10th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

230 F.2d 955

Saro A. DE FIORE
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5085.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

September 6, 1955.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

Fred T. Tanquary, Pueblo, Colo., for appellant.

Donald E. Kelley, U. S. Atty., and Robert Swanson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, HUXMAN, Circuit Judge, and SAVAGE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed on court's motion, for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

230 F.2d 955

Saro A. DE FIORE
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5085.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

September 6, 1955.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

Fred T. Tanquary, Pueblo, Colo., for appellant.

Donald E. Kelley, U. S. Atty., and Robert Swanson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, HUXMAN, Circuit Judge, and SAVAGE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed on court's motion, for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 F.2d 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saro-a-de-fiore-v-united-states-ca10-1955.