Sarno v. Sarno

660 N.E.2d 659, 422 Mass. 1001, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 23
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 6, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant appellant’s attempt to seek review of the denial of relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), must fail. To his challenge to the entry of a preliminary order that he pay a portion of the college tuition of his nineteen year old daughter, he added a request that the single justice declare G. L. c. 208, § 28 (1994 ed.), unconstitutional. His appeal disclaims any challenge to the single justice’s denial of relief from the preliminary order itself.

The request for a declaratory judgment seeks to present an issue that underlies the defendant’s challenge to the preliminary order of the trial court. The defendant has not demonstrated, or even argued, that review of the trial court decision after trial and final judgment will not adequately protect his interests. It may be that, on the facts, the issue of the constitutionality of G. L. c. 208, § 28, will never be reached.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sarno v. Sarno, 660 N.E.2d 659, 422 Mass. 1001, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 23 (Mass. 1996).

660 N.E.2d 659 (Sarno v. Sarno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. Walker
854 N.E.2d 1247 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2006)