Sarno v. Gulf Refining Co.
130 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 223, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 323
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice' Minturn in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sarno v. Gulf Refining Co., 130 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 223, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 323 (N.J. 1925).
130 A. 919 (Sarno v. Gulf Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Biniek v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
818 A.2d 330 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)
Allied Corp. v. Frola
730 F. Supp. 626 (D. New Jersey, 1990)
Aronsohn v. Mandara
484 A.2d 675 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
State, Dept. of Envir. Protection v. Exxon Corp. and Ici America, Inc.
376 A.2d 1339 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Walden v. Weinstein
284 A.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1971)
MAJESTIC REALTY ASSOC., INC. v. Toti Contracting Co.
149 A.2d 288 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Bergquist v. Penterman
134 A.2d 20 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Gibilterra v. Rosemawr Homes, Inc.
115 A.2d 553 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955)
Gibilterra v. Rosemawr Homes
108 A.2d 295 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Slattery v. Marra Bros.
92 F. Supp. 534 (S.D. New York, 1950)