Sarnicola v. Sarnicola
This text of 50 A.D.2d 842 (Sarnicola v. Sarnicola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered July 7, 1975, which (1) denied his motion to modify a prior judgment of divorce and (2) granted plaintiff’s cross motion to the extent, inter alia, of (a) directing the entry of a money judgment for the amount of arrears in the payment of alimony, child support and counsel fees pursuant to the said prior judgment and (b) awarded a counsel fee in the amount of $150 to plaintiff. Order reversed, without costs, and action remanded to Special Term for a hearing in accordance herewith. In the light of defendant’s allegation of drastically changed financial circumstances, Special Term acted improvidently in not holding a hearing to determine his current financial situation and the needs of plaintiff and the child (see Espejo v Espejo, 41 AD2d 555; cf. Matter of Hunter v Hunter, 41 AD2d 772; Berg v Berg, 48 AD2d 873). Rabin, Acting P. J., Latham, Hargett, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 842, 376 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarnicola-v-sarnicola-nyappdiv-1975.