Sarnelli v. IPI Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sarnelli v. IPI Industries, Inc.

8 A.D.3d 357, 777 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7843

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 7, 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J), dated March 26, 2003, which denied her motion to approve a proposed settlement nunc pro tunc in accordance with Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (5) as untimely.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion on the ground that it was untimely (see generally Zamfino v Furman, 1 AD3d 591 [2003]; Matter of Rifenburgh v James, 297 AD2d 901 [2002]; Matter of Bernthon v Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 279 AD2d 728 [2001]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J), dated March 26, 2003, which denied her motion to approve a proposed settlement nunc pro tunc in accordance with Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (5) as untimely.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion on the ground that it was untimely (see generally Zamfino v Furman, 1 AD3d 591 [2003]; Matter of Rifenburgh v James, 297 AD2d 901 [2002]; Matter of Bernthon v Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 279 AD2d 728 [2001]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Sarnelli v. IPI Industries, Inc., 8 A.D.3d 357, 777 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

8 A.D.3d 357 (Sarnelli v. IPI Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related