Sarlls v. State
This text of 230 S.W.2d 225 (Sarlls v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an endeavor to file a second motion for a rehearing based upon a nunc pro tunc judgment correcting a deficient record as shown upon the original hearing of this cause in this court. A supplemental transcript filed prior to the motion for a rehearing failed to contain such orders.
Upon the nunc pro tunc hearing, such orders were made to speak the truth. We see no notice of appeal present relative to such nun-c pro tunc proceedings, nor does there appear any notice of appeal in any of the transcripts. Without such notice, we have no jurisdiction herein.
Therefore, leave to file any further motion for a rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 S.W.2d 225, 154 Tex. Crim. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarlls-v-state-texcrimapp-1950.