Sarita Garg, Smith & Garg, LLC and Garg & Associates, PC v. Tuan M. Pham

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 9, 2015·No. 14-14-00787-CV·Published

Opinion

Motion Denied; Order filed April 9, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-14-00787-CV ____________

SARITA GARG, SMITH & GARG, LLC AND GARG & ASSOCIATES, PC, Appellants

V.

TUAN M. PHAM, Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008-43381

ORDER

Appellee filed a motion to correct and supplement the clerk’s record, citing to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 13.1 and 34.6(c), which apply to reporter’s records. Rule 34.5(c) applies to supplementation of the clerk’s record and provides:

If a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record, the trial court, the appellate court, or any party may be letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplement containing the omitted item. Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c).

Appellee’s motion is denied. Appellee may request supplementation of the clerk’s record directly from the Harris County District Clerk. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). “A party requesting that an item be included in the clerk’s record must specifically describe the item so that the clerk can readily identify it.” Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(b)(2).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sarita Garg, Smith & Garg, LLC and Garg & Associates, PC v. Tuan M. Pham, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Sarita Garg, Smith & Garg, LLC and Garg & Associates, PC v. Tuan M. Pham (Sarita Garg, Smith & Garg, LLC and Garg & Associates, PC v. Tuan M. Pham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.