Sarita Garg, Smith & Garg, LLC and Garg & Associates, PC v. Tuan M. Pham
Opinion
Motion Denied; Order filed April 9, 2015.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-14-00787-CV ____________
SARITA GARG, SMITH & GARG, LLC AND GARG & ASSOCIATES, PC, Appellants
V.
TUAN M. PHAM, Appellee
On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008-43381
ORDER
Appellee filed a motion to correct and supplement the clerk’s record, citing to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 13.1 and 34.6(c), which apply to reporter’s records. Rule 34.5(c) applies to supplementation of the clerk’s record and provides:
If a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record, the trial court, the appellate court, or any party may be letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplement containing the omitted item. Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c).
Appellee’s motion is denied. Appellee may request supplementation of the clerk’s record directly from the Harris County District Clerk. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). “A party requesting that an item be included in the clerk’s record must specifically describe the item so that the clerk can readily identify it.” Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(b)(2).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sarita Garg, Smith & Garg, LLC and Garg & Associates, PC v. Tuan M. Pham (Sarita Garg, Smith & Garg, LLC and Garg & Associates, PC v. Tuan M. Pham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.