Sarinana v. Soto

District Court, N.D. California·Decided August 10, 2020·No. 3:19-cv-00014·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ARMANDO SARINANA, No. C 19-0014 WHA (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SOTO v. S. SOTO; D. OSBORN; BOTELLO; E. MARTINEZ; R. BARCENA; M. Defendant. / Pursuant to the court’s order, plaintiff has provided an address at which to serve the sole remaining defendant, S. Soto. It is therefore ordered as follows: 1. The clerk shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint with all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon defendant S. Soto, a.k.a. S.G. Soto, at 228 Terez Street Apt. #391, P.O. Box 409090, Salinas, CA 93906. 2. Defendant Soto shall file an answer in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3. In order to expedite the resolution of this case: a. No later than 91 days from the date this order is filed, Soto shall file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. If Soto is of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the court prior to the date the summary judgment motion is due. All papers filed with the court shall be promptly served on the plaintiff. b. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion, if any, shall be filed with the court and served upon Soto no later than 28 days from the date of service of the motion. 4} Plaintiff must read the attached page headed “NOTICE -- WARNING,” which is provided to him pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 953-954 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). c. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date of service of the opposition. d. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the court so orders at a later date. e. Along with his motion, defendant shall file proof that they served plaintiff the Rand warning at the same time they served him with their motion. Failure to do so will result in 13 || the summary dismissal of their motion. 4. All communications by the plaintiff with the court must be served on defendant, or 15 || his counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the document to defendant or his counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. bee PX bet Dated: August □□□ 2020. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

If defendants move for summary judgment, they are seeking to have your case dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact--that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in [current Rule 56(c)], that contradict the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sarinana v. Soto, (N.D. Cal. 2020).

Sarinana v. Soto (Sarinana v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related