Sariah Garcia v. the State of Texas
This text of Sariah Garcia v. the State of Texas (Sariah Garcia v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-26-00024-CR
SARIAH GARCIA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1895369
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 18, 2025, Sariah Garcia pled guilty to the offense of theft of property
valued at less than $2,500.00, with two or more prior theft convictions. Garcia was sentenced to
ninety days’ confinement in jail. Despite the trial court’s certification that this was a plea-
agreement case and that Garcia had no right of appeal, she timely filed a notice of appeal. 1
Because we find that we are without jurisdiction, we will dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
The Texas Legislature has granted a very limited right of appeal in plea-bargain cases.
Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure details that right as follows:
(2) . . . In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may appeal only:
(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial,
(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or
(C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). There is no indication in the record before this Court that (1) this
specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute, (2) Garcia filed a motion that was ruled on
before trial, or (3) Garcia obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. To the contrary, the
trial court’s certification of Garcia’s right of appeal indicates that she has no right of appeal.
1 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (Supp.). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Second Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3. 2 Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, upon proper certification by
the trial court indicating there is no right of appeal, this Court will dismiss the appeal. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
On February 17, 2026, this Court sent Garcia a letter informing her of the apparent defect
in our jurisdiction over her appeal and afforded her an opportunity to respond and, if possible,
cure such defect. On February 23, 2026, we received Garcia’s response. In it, she concedes that
she pled to the charged-offense and that she “has no intent to oppose the dismissal of” this
appeal.
Because Garcia has no right of appeal due to her plea agreement with the State and
because the trial court’s certification correctly indicates that she is without a right of appeal, we
dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Scott E. Stevens Chief Justice
Date Submitted: February 26, 2026 Date Decided: February 27, 2026
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sariah Garcia v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sariah-garcia-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp6-2026.