Sargsyan v. Amazon.com Inc

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: September 16, 2025
• Docket: 2:25-cv-01257
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 ARTUR SARGSYAN, CASE NO. 2:25-cv-1257-JNW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 AMAZON.COM INC, 11 Defendant. 12 13 This matter comes before the Court on Pro se Plaintiff Artur Sargsyan’s 14 motion to “deny extension of time and request for expedited proceedings,” Dkt. No. 15 13, and “emergency motion to expedite ruling and deny extensions,” Dkt. No. 14. 16 The first motion seeks to preemptively deny Amazon any future ability to request 17 an extension of time to respond to Sargsyan’s complaint. His second motion asks 18 this Court to “expedite the overall consideration of this case to prevent irreparable 19 harm caused by ongoing financial hardship.” Dkt. No. 14 at 1. 20 Both motions are improper because Amazon has yet to appear. Courts “do not 21 sit to decide hypothetical issues or to give advisory opinions about issues as to 22 which there are not adverse parties before [the court],” so Sargsyan’s first motion is 23 1 denied for impermissibly seeking a ruling on an issue that isn’t actually before the

9 Court. Princeton Univ. v. Schmid, 455 U.S. 100, 102 (1982). As to Sargsyan’s second

3 motion, all matters of case scheduling are left to the Court’s sound discretion.

4 Sargsyan has identified no grounds to expedite the “overall” case; this matter will

5 proceed under the case schedule established by the Court and the Local Civil Rules.

G Accordingly, both motions are DENIED. Dkt. Nos. 138, 14.

7 8 Dated this 16th day of September, 2025.

9 Z. Z Lye 10 Jamal N. Whitehead United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23