Sargent v. State
This text of 828 P.2d 100 (Sargent v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Daniel Devone Sargent, appeals from the second denial by the trial court of a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to W.R.Cr.P. 36. The subject of exercised discretion to reduce a sentence under that rule is identically presented as discussed in our recent decision of Peper v. State, 776 P.2d 761 (Wyo.1989). Following a review of the record, we find no basis to determine that the trial court abused its discretion in the post-sentencing denial of the motion for reduction.
The order denying motion for sentence reduction, therefore, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
828 P.2d 100, 1992 Wyo. LEXIS 211, 1992 WL 61399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sargent-v-state-wyo-1992.