Sargent v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Sargent v. Smith

835 A.2d 476, 266 Conn. 926, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 461

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 12, 2003·No. SC 17093·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 78 Conn. App. 691 (AC 22997), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[927] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17093. Sabato P. Fiano, in support of the petition. Decided November 12, 2003

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendant?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did the Appellate Court properly direct judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $40,881.37, rather than remand the case for a new trial?”

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 78 Conn. App. 691 (AC 22997), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[927] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17093. Sabato P. Fiano, in support of the petition. Decided November 12, 2003

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendant?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did the Appellate Court properly direct judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $40,881.37, rather than remand the case for a new trial?”

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Sargent v. Smith, 835 A.2d 476, 266 Conn. 926, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 461 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

835 A.2d 476 (Sargent v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related