Sargent v. Putnam

58 N.H. 182
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedAugust 5, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 N.H. 182 (Sargent v. Putnam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sargent v. Putnam, 58 N.H. 182 (N.H. 1877).

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

Section 2 of chapter 35, Laws of 1876, authorizes the court to commit to one or more referees any cause at law or equity, or the determination of any question of fact “wherein the parties are not, as matter of right, entitled to a trial by jury.” “As matter of right” here means as matter of constitutional right. And, by the constitution, neither party is entitled to a jury trial for the settlement of accounts too complicated to be intelligently investigated and adjusted in that way. Copp v. Henniker, 55 N. H. 179, 210, 211; Perkins v. Scott, 57 N. H. 55, 81, 82, 83, 84; Bellows v. Bellows, ante, p. 60.

Exception overruled.

Bingham, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Low v. Independent Christian Society
32 A. 762 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.H. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sargent-v-putnam-nh-1877.