Sargent v. Putnam
This text of 58 N.H. 182 (Sargent v. Putnam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Section 2 of chapter 35, Laws of 1876, authorizes the court to commit to one or more referees any cause at law or equity, or the determination of any question of fact “wherein the parties are not, as matter of right, entitled to a trial by jury.” “As matter of right” here means as matter of constitutional right. And, by the constitution, neither party is entitled to a jury trial for the settlement of accounts too complicated to be intelligently investigated and adjusted in that way. Copp v. Henniker, 55 N. H. 179, 210, 211; Perkins v. Scott, 57 N. H. 55, 81, 82, 83, 84; Bellows v. Bellows, ante, p. 60.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 N.H. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sargent-v-putnam-nh-1877.