Sargent v. Hallcraft Homes, Inc.
This text of 512 P.2d 612 (Sargent v. Hallcraft Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal raises the same legal issue decided this date in Henshaw v. Mays, Ariz.App., 512 P.2d 604, that is, whether a workman who is injured in the course of his employment and who receives compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, may, after one year, having obtained an assignment from the compensation carrier of all its rights maintain an action against the alleged third party tortfeasor.
On March 25, 1970, plaintiff-appellant, Lester Edward Sargent, while in the employ of Sanner Contracting Company, was injured as the result of the alleged negligence of the defendant-appellees, Hallcraft Homes, Inc., and Cecil F. Perkins Co., Inc. The plaintiff applied for and obtained workmen’s compensation benefits from the State Compensation Fund and subsequently received an assignment from the Fund of all the rights it held under A.R.S. § 23-1023.
Approximately 13 months following the accident, the plaintiff brought an action in tort against the defendants. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that A.R.S. § 23-1023, subsec. B barred plaintiff’s cause of action where it was instituted more than one year after the cause of action accrued.
For the reasons stated in Henshaw v. Mays, supra, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 P.2d 612, 20 Ariz. App. 308, 1973 Ariz. App. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sargent-v-hallcraft-homes-inc-arizctapp-1973.