Sargent Lumber Co. v. J. W. Wells Lumber Co.

168 Ill. App. 581, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 1189
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 28, 1912
DocketGen. No. 16,401
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 Ill. App. 581 (Sargent Lumber Co. v. J. W. Wells Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sargent Lumber Co. v. J. W. Wells Lumber Co., 168 Ill. App. 581, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 1189 (Ill. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Sargent Lumber Company brought suit to recover $150 advanced and $19 expenses on a car of lumber ordered from the J. W. Wells Lumber Company. The.lumber having been rejected, the Wells Company voluntarily took charge of it. The Sargent Company requested the return of the $169 advanced, and after eleven months the Wells Company remitted its check for $36.87 with a letter. This suit is for the balance of $132.13, for which judgment was rendered.

If is claimed by the Wells Company, plaintiff in error, that the check for $36.87 was tendered as payment in full and was accepted by the Sargent Company upon that condition, and therefore, under the authority of Ostrander v. Scott, 161 Ill. 339, and other similar cases, this constituted full settlement of the account.

The check was in the usual form, and the letter merely said, “We herewith enclose you check for $36.87 balance of your credit on car No. 28055 which we have finally succeeded in getting a settlement on from Maxwell Bros Co. Tours truly, J. W. Wells Lumber Co.” With the check was also enclosed what purported to be a statement; but in none of these things is there any condition to the effect that if the check be accepted it must be as payment in full of all demands.

This being true, the plaintiff was entitled to retain the check and to recover for the balance due it.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whiting Stoker Co. v. Chicago Stoker Corporation
171 F.2d 248 (Seventh Circuit, 1948)
McKenna Process Co. v. Blatchford Corp.
25 N.E.2d 916 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 Ill. App. 581, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 1189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sargent-lumber-co-v-j-w-wells-lumber-co-illappct-1912.